Williams v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ANNUNZIATA, Judge.
Hurcus Jerome Williams (“appellant”) was convicted by bench trial of capital murder, robbery, and two counts of using a firearm in the commission of a felony. On appeal, appellant contends the trial court committed reversible error: (1) by admitting an accomplice’s out-of-court confession to police; and (2) by refusing to provide his accomplice’s confession to him before ruling on its admissibility. We disagree and affirm appellant’s convictions.
I
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The evidence at appellant’s trial established the following relevant facts, stated in the light most favorable…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Luginbyhl v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
- Bass v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- Corado v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- Luginbyhl v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.