Legal Opinion

Williams v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided August 3, 1999No. Record 2982-97-1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANNUNZIATA, Judge.

Hurcus Jerome Williams (“appellant”) was convicted by bench trial of capital murder, robbery, and two counts of using a firearm in the commission of a felony. On appeal, appellant contends the trial court committed reversible error: (1) by admitting an accomplice’s out-of-court confession to police; and (2) by refusing to provide his accomplice’s confession to him before ruling on its admissibility. We disagree and affirm appellant’s convictions.

I

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The evidence at appellant’s trial established the following relevant facts, stated in the light most favorable…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Luginbyhl v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  2. Bass v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  3. Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  4. Corado v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  5. Luginbyhl v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API