Legal Opinion

Fremont Canning Co. v. Waters

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1920No. Calendar No. 28,955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari to Newaygo; Barton (Joseph), J. Mandamus by the Fremont Canning Company to eompel James L. Waters, clerk of Dayton township, to draw an order in compliance with Act No: 347, Pub. Acts 1917. From an order denying the writ, ■plaintiff brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is certiorari to mandamus, and the questions raised and discussed relate to the constitutionality of Act No. 347 of the Public Acts of -1917, entitled,—

“An act regulating the -ownership and custody of dogs, providing for license and registration thereof, and the disposition of moneys received from license fees, and prescribing penalties for violation of this act, and 'to repeal act number forty-eight of the Public Acts of nineteen hundred one, and all amendments thereto.”

By the record it appears that on the night of February 8, 1919, a flock of sheep owned by the plaintiff was attacked…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Vernor v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Wall v. TrumbullMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Davock v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kurtz v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Westgate v. Township of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. WohlfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. County of Gratiot v. FederspielMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. SigersMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API