Legal Opinion

County of Gratiot v. Federspiel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1945No. Calendar No. 42,878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Defendant William G. Federspiel, treasurer of the County of Gratiot, was granted leave to appeal, so that inquiry might be made into the propriety of a writ.of mandamus issued by the circuit court requiring him to credit to the county law library fund of Gratiot county certaim moneys paid him “on account of fines assessed and collected,” as provided in Act No. 180, Pub. Acts 1935, amending 3 Comp. Laws 1929, §15179 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, § 15179, Stat. Ann. §27.2224).

The controlling question involved in this appeal 'is the constitutionality of the act just cited. Defendant contends that this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cady v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Attorney General v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Union Steam Pump Sales Co. v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Bowerman v. SheehanMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Marquardt v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adair v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Adair v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API