Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. People

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1876PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Error to Recorder’s Court of Detroit.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, J:

Plaintiff in error was convicted of keeping open on Sunday his saloon for the sale of intoxicating- liquors at retail, and of selling such liquors at retail on that day. The conviction was under section 1 of “an act to prevent the sale- or delivery of intoxicating liquors, wine and beer, to minors, and to drunken persons, and to habitual drunkards; to provide a remedy against persons selling liquor to husbands or children in certain cases,” approved May 3, 1875.

The clause under which he was convicted is as follows:

*281“All-saloons, restaurants, bars, bar-rooms, in taverns or…

2Cited by38 opinions

  1. Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Abeel v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State ex rel. Coffin v. AthertonNevada Supreme Court · 1886
  5. State ex rel. Gaulke v. TurnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API