Legal Opinion

Taylor v. . Carrow

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 13, 1911PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from Ward, J., at March Term, 1911, of Beaufort. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Chief Justice Ciarle.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, C. J.'

This is a petition for sale of land for partition, the plaintiff alleging that the land was not susceptible of actual partition. Some of the defendants answered, asking that the land be actually divided. The clerk made an order directing actual partition and appointing commissioners. To this order the petitioner and certain of the defendants excepted. • The commissioners attempted to make actual partition, and filed a report, but two of them reported further that owing to the shape, area, and topography of the land the best interest of all the parties would be subserved by a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ledbetter v. . PinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Simmons v. . FoscueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Trull v. . RiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. McMillan v. . McMillanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Horne v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Brown v. BogerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. In Re Will of MeadowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Barber v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Crocker v. VannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API