Legal Opinion

Trull v. . Rice

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

MotioN to set aside a sale and re-open biddings heard before Graves, Judge, on appeal from the clerk, at Spring Term, 1884, of RuNCOMBE Superior Court. His Honor refused to order a re-sale and affirmed the judgment of the clerk, from which the plaintiff J. R. Trull appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The petition for partition and sale of the tract of land described therein, in order to an assignment to the co-tenants in severalty of their respective shares, was filed on the 2d day of March, 1877, in the Superior Court of Buncombe, before the clerk, and after amendments introducing other interested parties in the action, was prosecuted to a final judgment for actual partition without a sale, in November, 1880. The land is estimated to contain one hundred and fifty acres, whereof the petitioners James R. Trull, Emma, Charles M., and Julia McAfee, and the defendant Polly Rice are entitled…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Governor Ex. Rel. Trustees of University of N. C. v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  2. State Ex. Rel. Attorney General v. Roanoke Navigation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Blue v. . BlueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. Wood Adm'r v. . Parker and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  5. Pritchard v. . AskewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morrison v. BurnetteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Taylor v. . CarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Marsh v. . NimocksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Thompson v. RospigliosiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Thompson v. . RospigliosiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API