Legal Opinion

Brown v. Boger

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1965No. 473PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoose, J.

Defendants except to and assign as error the findings of fact and conclusions of law set out in numbered paragraphs 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11 of the judgment below. They say and contend that the evidence does not support the findings of fact and the findings of fact do not support the conclusions of law.

For a clear understanding of the problem presented, a brief review of the legal principles involved is essential.

“At common law and in equity as well, in proceedings for partition of land, the cotenants were entitled to partition in kind if they so demanded, regardless of the difficulty or…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bizzell v. BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Taylor v. . CarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Ledbetter v. . PinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Trowbridge v. DonnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Seawell v. SeawellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. WillardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Kayann Properties, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API