Legal Opinion

Crocker v. Vann

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 27, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogden, J.

Tbe plaintiff claims a one-twelftb undivided interest in tbe land involved in tbis controversy as beir at law of ber aunt, Martba W. Parker. Tbe defendants claim tbe land under tbe will of A. I. Parker, tbe busband of Martba W. Parker. Tbe first question, therefore, to be determined is wbetber or not Martba W. Parker, upon ber death in 1914, owned an interest in said land. If she did, the-plaintiff is entitled to recover. If she did not, tbe plaintiff has no interest in tbe land and tbe judgment of tbe court was correct.

Tbe record discloses that tbe land in controversy, except tbe Old Town…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Smith v. Proctor.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Condry v. . CheshireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Card v. Finch.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Harrington v. Rawls.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Glass v. Lynchburg Shoe Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Caldwell v. . BlountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Hyman v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API