Legal Opinion
In Re Stanback
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 30, 1996No. 91-BG-1527PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
This matter is before the court on the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) that respondent, Clarence F. Stanback, Jr., be disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, based on the Board’s findings that respondent committed the following violations of the disciplinary rules: failure to preserve the identity of estate funds in an identifiable account; intentional misappropriation; failure to maintain complete records of estate funds coming into his possession; and neglect of a legal matter.1 The Board also…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First City Financial Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Michigan Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re LopesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In re SilvaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In Re BernsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.