Legal Opinion
Arnold v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 19, 2002No. Civ.A. 01-1327(RCL)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Now before the Court is defendants’ motion, to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, .and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Specifically, defendants contend that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because plaintiffs claims, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, are time-barred by the District of Columbia statute of .limitations, and that even accepting the facts in plaintiffs complaint as true, he fails to state a claim upon which relief can -be granted. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss at 1.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Fletcher v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Jones v. RitterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Hunt v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Brown v. Hines-WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.