Legal Opinion
Jones v. Ritter
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 19, 2008No. Civil Action 07-1674 (JR)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES ROBERTSON, District Judge.
For the reasons discussed below, the Motion of Defendants District of Columbia, Michael Boland and Charles Ramsey to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint will be granted in part and denied in part without prejudice. 1 The District of Columbia’s 'Second Motion to Dismiss will be denied, and the Motion to Dismiss Filed on Behalf of James Ritter will be granted as conceded. 2 Officer Steven Prade’s Motion to Dismiss will be denied without prejudice. In addition, the Court grants plaintiffs motion to appoint counsel. 3
I. BACKGROUND
The incident…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Singh v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Patrick v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Roane v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Clark v. Estate of FlachDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Aubin v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.