Legal Opinion
Hunt v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 18, 2009No. Civil Action 03-900 (RWR)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Marla Hunt has sued DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (“DePuy”), manufacturer of her prosthetic hip, for breach of implied warranties, breach of express warranty, and replevin. DePuy moves for summary judgment, arguing that no express warranty was made, and that the implied warranty and replevin claims are barred by the statute of limitations. Because DePuy’s argument .regarding the express warranty is unopposed, and the statute of limitations has run on the breach of implied warranty claims, but not on the replevin claim,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- A.I. Trade Finance, Inc. v. Petra International Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Kuwait Airways Corporation v. American Security Bank, N.A. And First American Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Perry v. ScholarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- In Re: In the Matter of the Fort Totten Metrorail Cases Arising Out of the Events of June 22, 2009District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- QUALITY AIR SERVICES, LLC v. Milwaukee Valve Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Hunt v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- In Re Fort Totten Metrorail CasesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.