Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Bialobrzeski
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
In this foreclosure action, the pro se defendant, Paul Bialobrzeski, claims that the plaintiff1 lacked standing to bring the action because it was not in possession of the subject note and mortgage at the time the action was commenced. The resolution of that claim is predicated on a finding of fact that is not part of the record. Our rules of practice require the appellant to provide an adequate record for review. See Practice Book §§ 60-5 and 61-10. Because the record is devoid of a factual finding as to when the plaintiff came into possession of the note, we are unable to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. BonnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Chase Home Finance, LLC v. FequiereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Seymour v. Region One Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Cross v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. FordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Merrill v. NRT New England, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Hayes Family Ltd. Partnership v. Town of GlastonburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Bank of New York Mellon v. HorseyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- American Tax Funding, LLC v. Design Land Developers of Newtown, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.