Legal Opinion

Roth v. Roth

New York County Courts

Decided October 15, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal on questions of law from a judgment of $35 and costs, rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in the City Court of Rome.

1Opinion of the CourtHazard, J.

The parties to this action are husband and wife. On the 7th of December, 1909, they entered into “ articles of separation ” in about the usual,form, providing that the parties should live separate and apart, and that the husband should pay the wife for her support the monthly sum of thirty-five dollars. This action was brought to recover an installment becoming due under said agreement. The defence interposed was that the wife had been guilty of gross misconduct, including adultery, and proof was given upon the trial to that effect, notwithstanding which a judgment was rendered for -the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Duryea v. . BlivenNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Hawkins v. . HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Muth v. WuestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Deisler v. DeislerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  5. Hughes v. CumingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Randolph v. FieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. Walter v. WalterCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1957
  3. Randolph v. FieldAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914
  4. Walter v. WalterCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1957
  5. Stevens v. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API