Legal Opinion

Walter v. Walter

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided February 8, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

Plaintiff seeks a declaration that defendant must continue to make support payments to her under their separation agreement even though the defendant has since obtained a divorce from plaintiff on the grounds of adultery occurring after the execution of the agreement.

Plaintiff and defendant were married on February 19, 1938, and three children were born of the marriage. In October 1954, they separated. The defendant-husband remained at the family domicile while the plaintiff-wife set up new living quarters. On November *28210, 1954, a separation agreement (“agreement”) was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Mohrmann v. KobNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Randolph v. FieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. Heinsohn v. ChandlerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1938
  5. Whittle v. SchlemmSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Farm Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1963
  2. Walter v. WalterCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1957
  3. In re Farm Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API