Duryea v. . Bliven
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme-Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order-made the first Monday in March, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon, a verdict directed by the court. This action was brought to recover certain sums- alleged to be due under a separation agreement. The-part of the agreement which related to the defendant’s intercourse with his children was valid. (Allen v. Affleck, 64 How.
Read the full summary
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme-Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order-made the first Monday in March, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon, a verdict directed by the court. This action was brought to recover certain sums- alleged to be due under a separation agreement. The-part of the agreement which related to the defendant’s intercourse with his children was valid. (Allen v. Affleck, 64 How. Pr. 385; Bolen v. Bolen, 44 Hun, 362.) The exception to the direction-of a verdict was sufficient. (Trustees, etc., v. Kirk,…
1Opinion of the Court
Follett, Ch. J.
June 5,1872, Emma L. Duryea and Charles J. Bliven intermarried, and April 14,1873, a son named Henry A. and August 8, 1875, a daughter named Marguerite D. were born. Afterwards differences arose between the husband and the wife and they separated, she bringing an action for a limited divorce. On the 19th day of February, 1883, the husband, as party of the first part, the wife, as party of the second part, and Alonzo Duryea, the father of the wife, as party of the third part, executed a contract by which the husband and wife agreed to live apart. It was provided that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
3Cited by62 opinions
- "Lola Almandares" v. "Diego Almandares"New York Family Court · 1946
- Borax v. BoraxNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Van Horn v. Van HornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Muth v. WuestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Schacht v. SchachtNew York Family Court · 1946
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.