Legal Opinion

CHEN

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided January 11, 2023No. ID 4057PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

28 I&N Dec. 676

(BIA 2023) Interim Decision #4057 Matter of Yun-Xia CHEN, Respondent Decided January 11, 2023 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) The “stop-time” rule under section 240A(d)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1229b(d)(1), is not triggered by the entry of a final removal order, but rather only by service of a statutorily compliant notice to appear or the commission of specified criminal offenses, in accordance with the plain language statutory analysis provided in Niz-Chavez v. Garland,

141 S.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. LARIOS-GUTIERREZ DE PABLOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2024
  2. Z-R-C-NBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2026
  3. Juan Carlos Pastor-Hernandez v. Pamela BondiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  4. Z-R-C-NBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API