Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1939No. 27278PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The precise question for determination is: Can a workman who has secured a compensation award for the complete loss of sight in an eye, under the schedule in Section 1465-80, General Code, rightfully demand the immediate weekly payment of such award, when, under the provisions of Section 1465-79, General Code, he has been awarded and is receiving compensation representing two-thirds of his average weekly wages, for temporary total disability due to a back injury sustained in another later accident, while working for the same employer?

An answer to this question depends upon a consideration of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Albert A. Albrecht Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Ingram v. W. J. Rainey, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Nelson v. Service Oil Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Latino v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State ex rel. Benton v. Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Fleischman v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State ex rel. Arberia, L.L.C. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State ex rel. Doughty v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API