prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 12,033 Donald E. Derflinger v. Ford Motor Company
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge:
Donald E. Derflinger, Sr., appeals from entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Ford Motor Company, assigning error to the district court’s ruling that lack of privity barred his action. In Pierce v. Ford Motor Co., 190 F.2d 910, 913-15 (4th Cir.1951), we held that despite lack of privity, Virginia imposed liability on a manufacturer who negligently furnished a defective article that was imminently dangerous without notice of the defect. Because Pierce governs this case, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand for further proceedings.
I
2Cases cited9 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Pierce v. Ford Motor Co. Mahone v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Diana Broussard, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Roy A. Broussard, Deceased v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Standard Oil Co. v. Wakefield's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
- General Bronze Corp. v. KostopulosSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brubaker v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Brubaker v. City Of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Stubl v. T.A. Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Medalie v. FSC Securities Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2000
- Baker v. GurfeinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.