Gant v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtConnoe, J.
Only one question is presented for decision by defendant’s several assignments of error on this appeal: Was the bodily injury, which all the evidence shows was sustained by her on 10 January, 1927, the result of plaintiff “being struck ... by a moving automobile” ? Unless this question can be answered in the affirmative, it must be conceded that plaintiff cannot recover in this action. Defendant is liable to plaintiff only under the terms of the policy; if the injury which she sustained is not included within the terms of the policy, plaintiff cannot recover.
There was no evidence at the trial…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Penn v. Standard Life & Accidental InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
3Cited by23 opinions
- McDowell Motor Co. v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Maness v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Jolley v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Peirson v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Quinn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.