Legal Opinion

Kleinman v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 20, 1984No. 11419PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.

This action was brought by Harry H. Kleinman, the conservator of the estate of Charles H. Miller, to nullify the conveyance of real estate from Miller to his daughter, the defendant Beverly Miller Marshall, and to obtain other relief. The trial referee found that, at the time of the conveyance: Miller was incompetent; there was inadequate consideration for the conveyance; and Marshall exercised undue influence over her father and breached the fiduciary duty she *481owed him under a power of attorney. As a result, the court set aside the conveyance and ordered Marshall to account for the rents she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. O'Connor v. ChiascioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  3. Lupien v. LupienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Satti v. RagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Hennessy v. DenihanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mayer v. Biafore, Florek & O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Kerin v. StangleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Aksomitas v. AksomitasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Zanoni v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Biggs v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API