Lawson v. Adlard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Traverse county, Brown, J., presiding, vacating a writ of attachment allowed and issued on the ground of defendants’ non-residence, in an action on a promissory note of $600.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
From the affidavits upon which the court below tried the motion to vacate and set aside a writ of attachment, based upon an affidavit wherein it was asserted, as a ground for the attachment, that the defendants were not residents of this state, it appeared that for at least two years prior to February 1, 1889, the defendants, husband and wife, actually resided in Minnesota, occupying a house and lot owned by them in the village of Brown’s Valley. Mr. Adlard was about that time appointed government blacksmith at an agency situated upon an Indian reservation, in South Dakota, and immediately…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frost & Dickinson v. BrisbinNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- In re ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- Haggart v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Barney v. OelrichsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Keller v. CarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Raymond v. LeishmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Chapman v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Union National Bank v. FinleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Town of Albion v. Village of Maple LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Pech Manuf'g Co. v. GrovesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.