Legal Opinion
In re the Marriage of Pullen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 29, 1979No. D7705-06474, CA 10674PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.
In this appeal from the property division provisions of a dissolution decree, wife contends that the trial court’s order requiring her to pay husband $48,000 is inequitable and unconstitutional. Husband cross-appeals, contending that he should have been awarded approximately half of the total property owned by the parties.
The parties were married for eight years and have two children, ages 3 and 6. Husband, age 31, has been employed for several years as assistant branch manager of a major bank with an annual salary of slightly over $15,000. Wife is 32, has a college education, and has not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- American Can Co. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of WirthlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- In re the Marriage of FrishkoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Matter of Marriage of Olinger and OlingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Matter of Marriage of CoatsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- In Re the Marriage of JenksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.