Legal Opinion
Stanko v. Mahar
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 16, 2005No. 04-8084PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Rudy Stanko, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendant Jim Maher 1 on Mr. Stanko’s complaint alleging violations of his constitutional rights. 2 We affirm the entry of summary judgment in favor of Mr. Maher. 3
FACTS
Mr. Stanko is a resident of Gordon, Nebraska who operates as a stock owner and drover in Fremont, Natrona, and Teton Counties, Wyoming. Mr. Maher is a brand inspector employed by the State of Wyoming Livestock Board (Board).
1. Stanko’s complaint
In his complaint, Mr. Stanko alleges that on or about…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Deepwater Investments, Limited v. Jackson Hole Ski Corporation and Paul M. McCollisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Rector v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Becker v. KrollCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Mayfield v. BethardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Cardoso v. CalboneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Colby v. HerrickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Ward v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.