Legal Opinion
American Oil Co. v. Metz
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 20, 1930No. 256PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
On consideration of the motion of the appellee, the Cumberland and Westernport Transit Company, to dismiss the appeal herein, it is ordered that the appeal be, and it is hereby, dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zucht v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Sugarman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Roe v. Kansas Ex Rel. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Wabash Railroad v. FlanniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Erie Railroad v. SolomonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ricks v. Department of State Civil ServiceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Ramon P. Johnson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Brinkley v. HassigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Smallwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Sims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.