Legal Opinion

STATE Ex Rel MEDFORD PEAR CO. v. FOWLER

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1956PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEossman, J.

This cause came before the court when the relator, pursuant to Oregon Constitution, Art VII, § 2, filed with our clerk a petition for an alternative writ of mandamus directed to the assessor of Jackson county, and the court, following a study of the petition, assumed jurisdiction. Subsequent to service upon him of the alternative writ, the assessor, Eobert Gr. Fowler, filed an answer, and later the relator presented his reply. The pleadings revealed some issues of fact. Presently the defendant moved “for an order dissolving the alternative writ of mandamus for the reason and on the ground…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Columbia River-Longview Bridge Co. v. WellingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Johnson v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. State v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API