Legal Opinion

Ennis v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1933No. 24182. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

While standing on a sidewalk in the city of Spokane, Irene Burkmar, a minor, was struck by a runaway Ford truck owned by defendant B. E. Pritchett, an employee of defendant H. A. Smith. By a guardian ad litem, an action was instituted to recover for the personal injuries sustained by the minor. The trial of the cause resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants have appealed from the judgment on the verdict.

The undisputed facts are as follows: Appellant Smith was engaged in the electrical business in Spokane. That business necessitated response to calls at all hours for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. HogeWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Tyler v. Stephan's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Anning v. Rothschild & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Carroll v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Western Security Co. v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hayward v. YostIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Clark v. GneitingIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Stouffer-Bowman, Inc. v. WebberWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Van Court v. Lodge Cab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Blake Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. SaxonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API