Legal Opinion

Jones v. Hoge

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1907No. 6949PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered May 16, 1907, upon granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, after sustaining defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence and motion for judgment, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a pedestrian by being run over by an automobile.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

Respondent commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of being run over by defendant’s automobile, operated by one Barnes as chauffeur. The evidence showed that Barnes was employed by defendant to operate and care for his automobile, and to take the same to and from defendant’s home whenever ordered so to do by himself or wife. The machine was kept at a public garage, and Barnes was authorized to take the same therefrom whenever appellant or wife so directed, and to do so without making any request of the owners of the garage. At the time of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Morier v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Higgins v. . Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Slater v. Advance Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Engel v. . Eureka ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Fielder v. DavisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Linville v. . NissenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Guthrie v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  5. Daily v. MaxwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API