Legal Opinion

Van Court v. Lodge Cab Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1939No. 27305. Department OnePublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiffs brought suit to recover damages for injuries sustained by them while riding in a taxicab owned by defendant Lodge Cab Co., Inc. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company was made a party defendant for the reason that it was surety upon the bond executed by the cab company in accordance with Rem. Rev. Stat., Vol. 7A, § 6383 [P. C. § 236]. Trial by the court, without a jury, resulted in findings, conclusions, and judgment in favor of plaintiffs. Defendants have appealed.

Appellants make two contentions: (1) That, under the evidence, the trial court should have found, as a matter of fact and of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Halverson v. BlosserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. McMullen v. Warren Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. McQueen v. People's Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Clark v. Harnischfeger Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Davis v. BrowneWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Leuthold v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Foote v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Carlson v. WolskiWashington Supreme Court · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API