Van Court v. Lodge Cab Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
Plaintiffs brought suit to recover damages for injuries sustained by them while riding in a taxicab owned by defendant Lodge Cab Co., Inc. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company was made a party defendant for the reason that it was surety upon the bond executed by the cab company in accordance with Rem. Rev. Stat., Vol. 7A, § 6383 [P. C. § 236]. Trial by the court, without a jury, resulted in findings, conclusions, and judgment in favor of plaintiffs. Defendants have appealed.
Appellants make two contentions: (1) That, under the evidence, the trial court should have found, as a matter of fact and of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Halverson v. BlosserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- McMullen v. Warren Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
- McQueen v. People's Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Clark v. Harnischfeger Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Davis v. BrowneWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Leuthold v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Foote v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Carlson v. WolskiWashington Supreme Court · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.