Legal Opinion

In Re Bizar

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1983No. 57378PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goldenhersh

On May 18, 1981, the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission filed a two-count complaint against respondent, Philip Harold Bizar, who was licensed to practice law in Illinois on November 29, 1966, charging him with “the failure to account for the proceeds of a settlement, the failure to preserve the identity of funds and property of a client in violation of Canon 9, DR 9 — 102, of the Illinois Code of Professional Responsibility (1970), the wrongful conversion and commingling of clients’ funds, [and] overreaching,” tending to bring the legal profession into…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re ClayterIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re SaladinoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re StilloIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In Re KramerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. In Re CheronisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re EnstromIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re DemuthIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API