Legal Opinion

State v. Prado

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 18, 2014No. 105,401PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Moritz, J.:

Jorge Alberto Prado appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his plea and vacate the sentences imposed pursuant to the plea. Prado argues the district court erred by failing to inquire regarding an alleged conflict of interest between Prado and his counsel and by failing to appoint conflict-free counsel to represent Prado at the motion to withdraw plea and sentencing hearing.

*1252Under the unique circumstances of this case, we conclude Prado and his counsel alerted the trial court to a potential conflict between them, and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. State v. GalavizSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. VannSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. PfannenstielSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  4. State v. MoyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. State v. MoyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API