Legal Opinion

State v. Galaviz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 28, 2012No. Nos. 101,084; 101,085PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LüCKERT, J.:

In this appeal involving a probation revocation, Jose Galaviz argues his attorney’s position as the guardian ad litem for the victim of one of Galaviz’ crimes created a per se conflict of interest that denied Galaviz his right to effective assistance of counsel at his probation revocation proceeding. Galaviz, citing State v. Jenkins, 257 Kan. 1074, 898 P.2d 1121 (1995), argues this conflict so offended his rights as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution that reversal is automatic and he is not required to show…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Sola-Morales v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. SalarySupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  3. State v. BowenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. State v. CheathamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API