Legal Opinion
Reilly v. Smith
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 7, 2004No. AC 24217PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to review a decision the claims commissioner (commissioner) made pursuant to General Statutes § 4-148 dismissing a claim as untimely.1 We conclude that the *851court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear claims of this type and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.* 2
Although the complete factual basis underlying the plaintiffs claim can be found in State v. Reilly, 60 Conn. App. 716, 760 A.2d 1001 (2000), only the following facts and procedural history are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Chotkowski v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Circle Lanes of Fairfield, Inc. v. FaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Pavonix (Massachusetts), Inc. v. State of Connecticut, Judicial BranchConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
- Reilly v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004