Legal Opinion

Glacial Plains Cooperative v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 27, 2005No. A05-148PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

Appellant Glacial Plains Cooperative (“Glacial Plains”) challenges the district court’s grant of declaratory and injunctive relief to respondent Thomas Hughes, Jr. The district court held that, because respondent was a farm debtor and the debts were incurred on agricultural property, respondent is entitled to the protections of Minn.Stat. § 550.366 (2004). On appeal, Glacial Plains argues that because respondent is now employed as a truck driver, he should not be protected by Minn.Stat. § 550.366. We affirm.

FACTS

The underlying facts of this case are undisputed. Respondent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kersten v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Homart Development Co. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Eischen Cabinet Co. v. HildebrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. v. HasbargenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Green v. KellenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API