Legal Opinion
Halpern v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 19, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
The Government has moved to dismiss without prejudice, or to stay for an indefinite period, 1 an action by the plaintiff under the Inventive Secrecy Act of 1951, 35 U.S.C. § 183, seeking compensation for damage caused by an order of secrecy entered eleven years ago by the defendant in a patent application owned by plaintiff, and compensation for the use of his invention by the Government. After plaintiff filed his patent application on March 5, 1945, a secrecy order was entered by the Commissioner of Patents. On July 5, 1951, plaintiff was informed that his claims…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Marion B. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Farrand Optical Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
3Cited by3 opinions
- Otto Halpern v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Lee v. Electric Products Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1963
- United States v. 62.50 Acres of LandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959