Legal Opinion
Lee v. Electric Products Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 30, 1963No. Civ. A. No. C 63-404PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREEN, District Judge.
This is an action for patent infringement. The patent in suit is for an invention in “Alternating Current Drive and Control.”
Plaintiff has filed objections to twenty-nine of the interrogatories propounded by defendant.
Defendant, in turn, has filed a motion for extension of time within which to answer the complaint until ten days after plaintiff has answered the interrogatories.
As to the motion for extension, the Court does not believe that such an extension is necessary. If the answers to the interrogatories and subsequent discovery proceedings elicit facts not now known…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. ByrnesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Gagen v. Northam Warren Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Harvey v. LevineDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1960
- Hoak v. Empire Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1946
- Drake v. Pycopé, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trabon Engineering Co. v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
- Scovill Manufacturing Co. v. Sunbeam CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Foster Wheeler Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1971
- Deering Milliken Research Corp. v. Tex-Elastic Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.