Farrand Optical Co. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
This is a motion by which the defendant seeks an order to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that (1) the eomplaint fails to state a cause of action and (2) that this Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action; or, in the alternative, for summary judgment.
The motion raises primarily the issue as to whether an inventor whose patent application was directed to be kept secret, for purposes of national security, by the proper governmental officials and who alleges that he was damaged thereby and that thereafter the invention was used by the United…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Southeastern Oil Florida, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Latvian State Cargo & Passenger Steamship Line v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1955
3Cited by8 opinions
- Farrand Optical Co., Inc. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Marion B. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Constant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Halpern v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.