United States v. 62.50 Acres of Land
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, District Judge.
This is a condemnation proceeding. The Government has taken varying interests in the lands of the Diamond Alkali Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as defendant), including a fee simple and five different types of easements. These acquisitions cover only a part of defendant’s lands. It is reasonably obvious from the pleadings in this matter that the construction of a Nike site is planned on the land condemned.
The Government objects to four interrogatories propounded by defendant and moves that they be stricken.
Interrogatories 4 and 5 relate to an explosion which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- United States v. 50.34 Acres of LandDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Horace MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Martínez Rivera v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- United States v. 23.76 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. SpruellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
- Martínez Rivera v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962