Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Hirsch

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1989No. G002553PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*106Opinion

WALLIN, Acting P. J.

Husband appeals from an order denying his motion to classify certain debts satisfied with his postdissolution separate property as community obligations.

Claudia Mirken and Clement Hirsch were married in 1963 and separated in 1970. Prior to and during the marriage, Clement owned shares of stock in the Bank of Los Angeles and served on its board of directors. In 1966, the bank merged with United States National Bank (USNB) and Clement’s shares were converted into USNB stock. Clement sat on the new board of directors from January 1966 until March 1971, six months after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Marriage of SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. In Re Marriage of StittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. In Re Marriage of ListerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Oyakawa v. GillettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. In Re Marriage of BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Partridge v. PartridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. In Re Marriage of HirschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. In re CohenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API