Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Bell

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1996No. E013422PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAMIREZ, P. J.

Beth E. Bell (Wife) appeals from the bifurcated judgment dividing the property of the parties following dissolution of her 20-year marriage to John L. Bell (Husband). In particular, Wife objects to the trial court decision to attribute to Wife all the costs, but not the benefits, resulting from her embezzlement from her employer over a period of five years. We find certain of Wife’s contentions have merit and we reverse.

Facts

The facts underlying this case are largely undisputed. Husband and Wife were married in 1971 and separated in May 1991. During the early part of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of WattsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. In Re Marriage of StittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. In Re Marriage of HirschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Falcone v. FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Gagan v. GouydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Lu v. Deng CA6California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Marriage of Farida CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API