Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Stitt

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1983No. Civ. 6779PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOOLPERT, J.

This appeal presents us something old and something new. The old issue is whether a premarital couple may make as binding an oral agreement to own all future acquired property equally, irrespective of record title as may their married counterparts. Here, where the parties have relied on their agreement, we affirm the judgment holding the family home to be community property, even though some time prior to separation the parties had deeded it to the wife as her separate property. The new issue is whether the community should be responsible for unpaid attorney fees incurred…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re Marriage of LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Weinberg v. WeinbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Jacobs (In Re Jacobs)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1985
  2. In Re Marriage of McNeillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. In Re Marriage of BeltranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Oyakawa v. GillettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. In Re Marriage of HirschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API