Legal Opinion

Veatch v. American Tool

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 2004No. S-03-889PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The primary issue is whether we will apply Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786, 125 L. Ed. 2d 469 (1993), to workers’ compensation cases. A Workers’ Compensation Court review panel held that Daubert did not apply to the proceedings. Because the Nebraska rules of evidence do not apply in workers’ compensation cases, we hold that Daubert principles do not apply. We affirm.

ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR

American Tool assigns that the district court erred by (1) determining that the receipt of expert testimony in a workers’ compensation proceeding is not governed by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Schafersman v. Agland Coop.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Paulsen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Olivotto v. DeMarco Bros. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Risor v. Nebraska BoilerNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Zwiener w. Becton Dickinson-EastNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Swoboda v. Volkman Plumbing & EMCASCO InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Foster v. BryanLGH Medical Center EastNebraska Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API