Legal Opinion

Zwiener w. Becton Dickinson-East

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2013No. S-12-563PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets ZWIENER v. BECTON DICKINSON-EAST 735 Cite as

285 Neb. 735

contacts with the State of Nebraska. Although the Web site used to post the advertisement is interactive, the contacts created by the Web site are unrelated to Abdouch’s cause of action. Furthermore, under the Calder effects test, the plead- ings fail to establish that Lopez and KLB expressly aimed their tortious conduct at the State of Nebraska. For these reasons, Lopez and KLB could not have anticipated being haled into a Nebraska court for their online advertisement. Affirmed. Miller-Lerman, J., not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heiliger v. Walters & Heiliger Electric, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Alliance National Bank & Trust Co. v. State Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Frauendorfer v. Lindsay Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Anderson v. CowgerNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State v. OrdunaNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tchikobava v. Albatross ExpressNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Abdouch v. LopezNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Krause v. Five Star Quality Care, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Jacobitz v. Aurora Co-opNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Krause v. Five Star Quality CareNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API