Legal Opinion

Morton v. Bloom

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1973No. Civ. A. 73-384PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GOURLEY, District Judge.

This proceeding has been filed pursuant to the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, 30 U.S.C.A. § 801 et seq., hereinafter referred to as the Act. The immediate matter before the Court is plaintiff’s request for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief as provided in Section 108 of the Act, 30 U.S.C.A. § 818.

The Court has afforded the parties a full and complete hearing and has considered the briefs and arguments of counsel; and based thereon, the conclusion is compelled that there is no basis for granting the relief requested.

No dispute…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. SECRETARY OF INT., US DEPT. OF INTERIOR v. ShingaraDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Andrus v. P-Burg Coal Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1980
  3. Charles Sink v. Rogers Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  4. Marshall v. KraynakDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Marshall v. BosackDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API