Legal Opinion
Withrow v. Pickard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 7, 1995No. 81966PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATT, Justice:
SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 1987, Oklahoma Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Company (OFU) issued an insurance policy to W.E. Withrow, Jr., and his wife, Patricia, covering their family’s two vehicles. The policy provided for bodily injury liability limits of $25,000.00 per person and $50,000.00 per accident (25/50). When Mr. Withrow applied for the policy, he requested uninsured motorist (UM) coverage in amounts equal to his liability limits. The *802application Withrow read and signed stated that he selected the desired UM coverage:... with the full understanding that,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Lake v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Richardson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Beauchamp Ex Rel. Beauchamp v. Southwestern National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Scott v. Cimarron Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Haberman v. Hartford Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Towe, Hester & Erwin, Inc. v. Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
- Smith v. South Carolina InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.