Legal Opinion

Laurie Visual Etudes, Inc. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 29, 1979No. 76 Civ. 2305PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Laurie Visual Etudes, Inc. (“Laurie” or “Laurie Visual”), is the owner of a patent for a breath exercise device that it has never manufactured, licensed, sold or distributed on a commercial scale. It brings this action against defendant, Chesebrough-Pond’s, Inc. (“Chesebrough”), the owner of patents for breath exercise devices that it has manufactured and widely distributed in the commercial market, principally in the medical field. Plaintiff seeks recovery of treble damages from defendant upon a claim of alleged violation of the antitrust…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension PlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  3. GAF Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  4. WIXT Television, Inc. v. Meredith Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1980
  5. Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API