Legal Opinion
Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 14, 1983No. 80 Civ. 4258 (RLC)PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
I
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
In this action, Arthur M. Chambless (“plaintiff”), a veteran seaman, and his wife, Mildred H. Chambless, allege, inter alia, that his pension benefits have been improperly forfeited, that the trustees of his pension plan violated their fiduciary duties, and that his former union and former employers violated the antitrust laws by conspiring to deter him from working on vessels owned by competing shipping companies and represented by a rival union. Chambless and his wife seek restitution of the allegedly forfeited pension benefits, treble antitrust…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Arthur Chambless and Mildred H. Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Faircloth v. Lundy Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Teamster's Local 348 Health and Welfare Fund v. Kohn Beverage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.