State v. Baughman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polk District Court. These cases involve the same questions, and are submitted upon tbe same arguments. The defendants were severally indicted and tried for the crime of keeping a. nuisance. They were severally found guilty. After the making and overruling of motions for new trials, to which exceptions were duly taken, judgments were entered on the verdict. The defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.
1. intoxiindictment: üupücity.' I. It is insisted that the indictment charges two separate and distinct offenses; the one triable upon indictment, the other exclusively cognizable before justices of the peace, The indictments charge that the defendants “ did willfully and unlawfully establish, continue and use a *499building and place for the purpose and with the intent of ■ unlawfully owning, keeping and selling intoxicating liquors' witbin the State of Iowa, contrary to law; and then and-there did sell gin, rum, brandy, whisky and other intoxicating liquors contrary to law, to the great injury…
2Cited by11 opinions
- State v. OlanderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. PhippsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- State v. O'DellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.