Legal Opinion

State v. Phipps

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 7, 1895PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Boone District Court. — Hon. D. R. Hind-man, Judge. Defendants were jointly indicted for the crime of malicious mischief. They were each convicted of the offense charged, and appeal to this court.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

1 I. The charging part of the indictment is as follows: “The said William. Phipps and George Phipps, on the twenty-eighth day of February, A. D. 1892, in the county of Boone and state of Iowa, did willfully and unlawfully take and ride off one horse and one mare, the property of Robert Royster, and then and there did willfully, unlawfully, and maliciously secrete said horse and mare, and did injure said horse and mare by riding said horse and mare a long distance through the mud and snow, and turning them loose without food or care, all without the permission or consent of said Robert…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
  2. State v. CoosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
  3. State v. AbrahamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  4. State v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  5. State v. PaulSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. Omaha Elevator Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State v. LoserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Griffin v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. State v. FeuerhakenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. Hamby v. SamsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API