Legal Opinion

State v. O'Dell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 20, 1949No. 47411PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

— There is no allegation of error other than the extent of the sentence. The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court abused the discretion vested in that court by section 789.15 of 1he 1946 Code of Towa, by sentencing the defendant to an indeterminate term in the penitentiary, rather than a term in the county jail or payment of’ a fine. Defendant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction, but challenges the severity of the punishment imposed by the sentence.

The assault of which defendant was convicted occurred in what was known as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. HaydenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. State v. KendallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. State v. OlanderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. State v. GilesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. State v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KulishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  5. State v. HortonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API